Key result
Apixaban was superior to aspirin for stroke prevention with similar rates of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation, with consistent treatment effects across stroke risk scores.
Why the study?
Does apixaban reduce ischemic stroke compared to aspirin across different CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc risk strata in patients with atrial fibrillation?
RCT
Does apixaban reduce ischemic stroke compared to aspirin across different CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc risk strata in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Apixaban is consistently superior to aspirin for stroke prevention with similar major bleeding rates across all CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc risk strata in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support apixaban over aspirin across AF risk strata; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background— The impact of apixaban versus aspirin on ischemic stroke and major bleeding in relation to the CHADS 2 and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc stroke risk scores in atrial fibrillation has not been investigated. Methods and Results— In this secondary analysis of the AVERROES trial, our principal objective was to assess the effect of treatment with aspirin or apixaban on ischemic stroke and major bleeding, in relation to the CHADS 2 /CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores. We found no significant heterogeneity for treatment efficacy on ischemic stroke for apixaban when subdivided by stroke risk strata, based on CHADS 2 /CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc. Effects were consistent irrespective of baseline risk, and thus, absolute benefits were greatest in the high-risk groups. There was also no significant heterogeneity for apixaban versus aspirin with regard to major bleeding, when subdivided by CHADS 2 /CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores. In multivariable analysis, significant predictors of stroke on aspirin were age ≥75 years, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min, and nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Proportions of the study cohort classified as low/moderate/high risk using the CHADS 2 and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores were 0.3%/71.7%/28.1% and <0.1%/10.5%/89.5%, respectively. Conclusions— In an atrial fibrillation population, apixaban was superior to aspirin for stroke prevention, with similar rates of major bleeding, in the presence of one or more stroke risk factors, with consistency of the treatment effect by CHADS 2 /CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lip et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Atrial Fibrillation. Apixaban vs. Aspirin was evaluated on Ischemic stroke and major bleeding. Apixaban was superior to aspirin for stroke prevention with similar rates of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation, with consistent treatment effects across stroke risk scores.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: