Key result
Upper arm temporary pacemaker access during TAVR shows no significant bleeding benefit over femoral access.
Why the study?
Using an upper arm vein rather than the commonly used femoral vein for temporary pacemaker access during TAVR potentially causes fewer bleeding complications and shorter time to mobilization, but its safety and efficacy required assessment.
Does using an upper arm vein as a temporary pacemaker access site reduce bleeding complications and time to mobilization compared to femoral or jugular vein access in patients undergoing TAVR?
Cohort (n=557)
No
Does using an upper arm vein as a temporary pacemaker access site reduce bleeding complications and time to mobilization compared to femoral or jugular vein access in patients undergoing TAVR?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.4% vs 6.1%
p-value: p=0.10
Using an upper arm vein for temporary pacemaker access during TAVR is a safe and feasible alternative to femoral access, significantly shortening time to mobilization.
Supports shorter mobilization with upper arm access in TAVR; leaves open bleeding benefit versus femoral access in randomized trials.
Background The femoral vein is commonly used as a pacemaker access site during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Using an upper arm vein as an alternative access site potentially causes fewer bleeding complications and shorter time to mobilization. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of an upper arm vein as a temporary pacemaker access site during TAVR. Methods We evaluated all patients undergoing TAVR in our center between January 2020 and January 2023. Upper arm, femoral, and jugular vein pacemaker access was used in 255 (45.8%), 191 (34.3%), and 111 (19.9%) patients, respectively. Clinical outcomes were analyzed according to pacemaker access in the overall population and in a propensity-matched population involving 165 upper arm and 165 femoral vein patients. Primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 pacemaker access site-related bleeding. Results In the overall population, primary endpoint was lowest for upper arm, followed by femoral and jugular vein access (2.4% vs. 5.8% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.003). Time to mobilization was significantly longer (p < 0.001) in the jugular cohort compared with the other cohorts. In the propensity-matched cohort, primary endpoint showed a trend toward lower occurrence in the upper arm compared with the femoral cohort (2.4% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.10). Time to mobilization was significantly shorter (480 vs. 1140 min, p < 0.001) in the upper arm cohort, with a comparable skin-to-skin time (83 vs. 85 min, p = 0.75). Cross-over from upper arm pacemaker access was required in 17 patients (6.3% of attempted cases via an upper arm vein). Conclusions Using an upper arm vein as a temporary pacemaker access site is safe and feasible. Its use might be associated with fewer bleeding complications and shorter time to mobilization compared with the femoral vein.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rooijakkers et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n=557). Upper arm vein temporary pacemaker access vs. Femoral and jugular vein temporary pacemaker access was evaluated on Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 pacemaker access site-related bleeding (p=0.10). Upper arm vein temporary pacemaker access during TAVR showed a trend toward lower BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding compared with femoral access (2.4% vs. 6.1%, p=0.10) and shorter mobilization time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: