Key result
CTD-PAH carries a 60% five-year survival rate.
Why the study?
CTD-associated PAH is a rare but severe complication of CTD and represents the most common subgroup of PAH in East Asia.
Does PAH-specific therapy improve outcomes in patients with connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Cohort (n=41)
No
Does PAH-specific therapy improve outcomes in patients with connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension?
In patients with CTD-PAH, 5-year survival is 60%, and PAH-specific therapy improves functional and hemodynamic parameters.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare but severe complication of connective tissue disease (CTD). CTD-associated PAH (CTD-PAH) is the most common subgroup of PAH in East Asia. We prospectively collected 41 patients with CTD-PAH and followed them for a mean period of 43 ± 36 months. The long-term survival rates of the CTD-PAH patients at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years were 90%, 80%, 77%, and 60%, respectively. The non-survivors had more dilated main pulmonary arteries, higher pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). PAH-specific therapy resulted in improvements in functional class, 6-minute walk distance, serum uric acid, right ventricular function and PVR. Increased C-reactive protein during follow-up, indicating inflammatory processes, was also crucial for the management of CTD-PAH. Therefore targeting both PAH and inflammation is important in this specific subgroup of PAH. The results of this study may help develop treatment strategies for CTD-PAH patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsieh et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (n=41). PAH-specific therapy was evaluated on Long-term survival rates at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years. In patients with connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension, long-term survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 90%, 80%, 77%, and 60%, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: