Key result
Hypertension pharmacogenomics promises personalized care but faces clinical, trial, cost, and equity barriers.
Why the study?
While pharmacogenomics offers opportunities for personalized hypertension management, several obstacles hinder its widespread adoption.
While pharmacogenomics holds promise for precision medicine in hypertension, significant clinical, financial, and evidentiary barriers must be overcome before routine implementation.
Does not support routine pharmacogenomic testing in hypertension; leaves open needs for larger trials addressing actionability, cost, and equity.
polymorphisms. We also examine the role of Mendelian randomization, polygenic risk scores in drug development and stratifying hypertension treatment response. While PGx offers opportunities for personalized medicine - such as reducing trial-and-error prescribing and improving adherence - several obstacles hinder its widespread adoption. These include limited clinical actionability, lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials, cost constraints, and concerns about equity and accessibility. Furthermore, drug-gene interactions and phenoconversion add complexity to implementation. Emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence-driven prescribing, microbiome integration, and pharmacoepigenomics, may enhance PGx precision in hypertension management. However, further research, clinical validation, and policy frameworks are necessary before PGx can be routinely incorporated into hypertension care. This review critically evaluates both the promise and limitations of PGx in hypertension, offering insights into the future of precision medicine in cardiovascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le et al. (2025) conducted a review in Hypertension. Pharmacogenomics was evaluated. Pharmacogenomics in hypertension offers opportunities for personalized medicine but faces obstacles like limited clinical actionability, lack of large trials, cost constraints, and equity concerns.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: