Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Visual similarity analysis of ethnic brocades is valuable for image retrieval, style comparison, and digital archiving in cultural heritage informatics. However, although deep neural networks provide powerful visual representations, their encoded similarity structures are often difficult to interpret. This study presents an interpretable deep feature framework for analyzing inter-ethnic visual similarity in brocade images from ten minority groups in Southwest China. Four convolutional neural network backbones, including AlexNet, VGG-16, ResNet-18, and an SE-enhanced ResNet-18 (SResNet-18), were first evaluated to identify a reliable feature extractor. The best-performing model was then used to construct deep feature-based similarity and distance relationships among ethnic categories. To interpret this structure, five handcrafted descriptor types, namely color, texture, geometric, local-structure, and frequency-domain features, were compared with the deep feature similarity matrix using Spearman correlation analysis and weighted descriptor fusion. Experimental results showed that SResNet-18 achieved the best classification performance, with an accuracy of 95.15% and an F1-score of 95.14%. Among the handcrafted descriptors, color showed the strongest correspondence with the RGB-based deep similarity structure (r=0.643), followed by local-structure descriptors (r=0.416), whereas classical texture descriptors showed near-zero correspondence (r=−0.063). The optimal weighted fusion further improved the correlation to r=0.731. These findings suggest that the SResNet-18 feature space is more strongly associated with color composition and local motif organization than with the specific grayscale texture, global geometric, or frequency-domain descriptors used in this study. The proposed framework provides an interpretable approach for understanding deep visual similarity in cultural heritage images and offers methodological support for pattern-based retrieval, comparative style analysis, and digital documentation.
Li et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: