Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The overall feasibility of 3-D color imaging is determined, taking into account display method, display options, and image processing system. The method is based on the display of 3-D colored ranges of data values and allows very complex convoluted structures with disjoint parts to be imaged. This approach results in a very fast, interactive method for interpreting the position, size, and shape of 3-D structures. Display options are needed to clarify the perception of the three-dimensional relationships; a single presentation mode is not sufficient. Seven options are used: multiple structures, point of view, projection angle, cutout, transparency, contours, and stereo. The options are selected by interacting visually with the image of the 3-D structures on a high-resolution color monitor 1024×1024. The image processing system consists of a host computer IBM 370/168 and an image processing workstation IBM 7350. The host performs data file management, selection of subimages, initial data smoothing, and 3-D data rotation. The workstation provides interactive 3-D imaging with oblique projection, data cutout, transparency, smoothing, and color selection. Since all of the scan data are resident in the 7350 storage buffers, 3-D images can be formed in 10 to 20 seconds. These techniques are illustrated using computer tomography (CT) scans from a group of patients with various structural abnormalities of the brain. Examples of the enhanced diagnostic capability of CT with 3-D imaging as well as its application in the surgical approach to tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farrell et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: