Key result
Administration of the AGE cross-link breaker ALT-711 for 1 month in aged dogs significantly reduced age-related left ventricular stiffness by approximately 40%.
Why the study?
Does the AGE cross-link breaker ALT-711 reduce age-related left ventricular stiffness in aged dogs?
Does the AGE cross-link breaker ALT-711 reduce age-related left ventricular stiffness in aged dogs?
The AGE cross-link breaker ALT-711 significantly reverses age-related increases in left ventricular stiffness and improves cardiac function in aged dogs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ALT-711 merits human trials for diastolic stiffness; leaves open clinical translation from this animal model.
Decreased elasticity of the cardiovascular system is one of the hallmarks of the normal aging process of mammals. A potential explanation for this decreased elasticity is that glucose can react nonenzymatically with long-lived proteins, such as collagen and lens crystallin, and link them together, producing advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs). Previous studies have shown that aminoguanidine, an AGE inhibitor, can prevent glucose cross-linking of proteins and the loss of elasticity associated with aging and diabetes. Recently, an AGE cross-link breaker (ALT-711) has been described, which we have evaluated in aged dogs. After 1 month of administration of ALT-711, a significant reduction ( approximately 40%) in age-related left ventricular stiffness was observed [(57.1 +/- 6.8 mmHg x m(2)/ml pretreatment and 33.1 +/- 4.6 mmHg x m(2)/ml posttreatment (1 mmHg = 133 Pa)]. This decrease was accompanied by improvement in cardiac function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asif et al. (2000) studied Age-related myocardial stiffness. ALT-711 vs. Pretreatment was evaluated on Left ventricular stiffness (40% reduction). Administration of the AGE cross-link breaker ALT-711 for 1 month in aged dogs significantly reduced age-related left ventricular stiffness by approximately 40%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: