Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background To determine if hyperuricemia be a metabolic response to prevent brain injury in high-altitude adaption in Tibet. Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled 3 ethnics of males (18–35 yo) from 3 ascending altitudes ( n = 1133). Metabolic and brain injury biomarkers were compared among the 3 ethnics, and between the normal (NUA) and high serum uric acid (HUA) groups. Results Serum UA levels were simultaneously increased with altitudes in the 3 ethnics (all P < 0.0001), higher in the Hans and Minority than in the Tibetans (both: P < 0.0001). Exclusively in the Hans, xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) activity was increased ( P < 0.0001) whereas fractional excretion of UA was decreased ( P < 0.0001) with altitudes, meanwhile, HOMA-IR ( P < 0.0001) and HOMA-β ( P = 0.017) were invariably reduced, and GLP-1(1-37a) ( P < 0.0001) was consistently elevated with the altitudes. Beneficially, arteriosclerosis index was elevated with the altitudes in both the Tibetans and the Minorities rather than in the Hans. The level of pan-axonal marker, PGP 9.5, was elevated with altitudes only in the Hans ( P = 0.007), by contrast, the astrocyte marker GFAP were elevated in both the Tibetans ( P = 0.0003) and the Minorities ( P = 0.038) but not in the Hans ( P = 0.13). In comparison of HUA with NUA, while the Hans in shorter stay Lhasa-Yumai showed higher XOR, HOMA-IR, GLP-1(1-37a) and PGP 9.5 levels, PGP9.5 was lower in the Hans in longer stay Lhasa-Tolun; yet both neural biomarkers were elevated in the Tibetans of Lhasa, and tended to decline in Naqu. Conclusion Hyperuricemia may follow distinctive neuroendocrine mechanism among the 3 ethnics to protect the brain from oxidative stress in Tibet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: