Key result
Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in sarcoidosis yielded similar composite outcomes to medical therapy during non-elective (9.0% vs 12.0%, p=0.312) and elective (3.2% vs 7.8%) admissions.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation can be useful for ventricular tachycardia, but few studies have compared it with medical therapy in patients with sarcoidosis.
Does catheter ablation reduce inpatient mortality, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and 30-day hospital readmissions compared to medical therapy in patients with sarcoidosis and ventricular tachycardia?
Observational (n=1,581)
Yes
Does catheter ablation reduce inpatient mortality, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and 30-day hospital readmissions compared to medical therapy in patients with sarcoidosis and ventricular tachycardia?
Absolute Event Rate: 9% vs 12%
p-value: p=0.312
Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in sarcoidosis patients is safe and associated with similar rates of 30-day readmission and in-hospital adverse events compared to medical therapy.
Catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be a useful treatment strategy, however, few studies have compared CA to medical therapy (MT) in the sarcoidosis population. To assess in-hospital outcomes and unplanned readmissions following CA for VT compared to MT in patients with sarcoidosis. Data was obtained from the Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2010 and 2019 to identify patients with sarcoidosis admitted for VT either undergoing CA or MT during elective and non-elective admission. Primary endpoints were a composite endpoint of inpatient mortality, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and 30-day hospital readmissions. Procedural complications at index admission and causes of readmission were also identified. Among 1581 patients, 1217 with sarcoidosis and VT underwent MT compared to 168 with CA during non-elective admission. 63 patients admitted electively underwent CA compared with 129 managed medically. There was no difference in the composite outcome for patients undergoing catheter ablation or medical therapy during both non-elective (9.0 % vs 12.0 %, p = 0.312) and elective admission (3.2 % vs. 7.8 %, p = 0.343). The most common cause of readmission were ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in both groups, however, those undergoing elective CA were less likely to be readmitted for VA compared to non-elective CA. The most common complication in the CA group was cardiac tamponade (4.8 %). VT ablation is associated with similar rates of 30-day readmission compared to MT and does not confer increased risk of harm with respect to inpatient mortality, cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Further research is warranted to determine if a subgroup of sarcoidosis patients admitted with VT are better served with an initial conservative management strategy followed by VT ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurin et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Sarcoidosis with ventricular tachycardia (n=1,581). Catheter ablation vs. Medical therapy was evaluated on Composite of inpatient mortality, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and 30-day hospital readmissions (p=0.312). Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in sarcoidosis yielded similar composite outcomes to medical therapy during non-elective (9.0% vs 12.0%, p=0.312) and elective (3.2% vs 7.8%) admissions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: