Why the study?
Does the loss of late potentials after myocardial infarction reduce the risk of arrhythmic events compared to retained late potentials?
Does the loss of late potentials after myocardial infarction reduce the risk of arrhythmic events compared to retained late potentials?
The loss of late potentials after myocardial infarction does not necessarily confer an improved prognosis in terms of risk of arrhythmic events compared to patients who retain late potentials.
Loss of late potentials post-MI does not improve arrhythmic prognosis versus retention; hypothesis-generating for risk stratification in observational data.
The prognosis of patients following myocardial infarction is adversely affected by the finding of late potentials at the time of hospital discharge. Loss of late potentials has been previously reported during seriai testing during the first year after infarction, but it is not known whether such patients remain at risk of arrhythmic events. This study prospectively followed 243 patients after myocardial infarction. Late potentials were observed in 92 patients (group 1) at the time of hospital discharge. Of these patients, 23 no longer had late potentials at G‐week follow‐up and 8 had had an arrhythmic event (sudden death or ventricular tachycardia). In patients with loss of late potentials, overall QRS duration had decreased from 109 ± 11 msec at discharge to 104 ± 11 msec (P < 0.01), terminal QRS voltage rose from 15 ± 4 μV to 31 ± 9 μV (P = 0.001), and late potential duration fell from 42 ± 6 msec to 28 ± 6 msec (P = 0.001) at the 6‐week study. Predictors of loss of late potentials were: initial duration of the QRS duration (P < 0.001) and terminal voltage (P < 0.005); non‐Q wave infarction (P < 0.001); and being a male (P < 0.05). After the 6‐week assessment, 11 additional arrhythmic events occurred during median follow‐up of31 months. The risk of arrhythmic events was similar in patients with loss of late potentials and those who retained late potentials in group I (9% vs 11%, P ‐ NS) but significantly greater than palients with no late potentials at discharge (group II, 2%). Of those patients with events beyond 6 weeks, a normal signal‐averaged ECG (either lost late potentials or group II) was observed in 6/11 (55%) patients on at least one occasion prior to the occurrence of the event. Hence, a significant number of arrhythmic events occurring ≥ 6 weeks after myocardial infarction occur in palients with a normal signal‐averaged ECG even when late potentials are initially present. “Loss’ of late potentials does not necessarily confer an improved prognosis in terms of risk of arrhythmic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuchar et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: