Key result
A home blood pressure monitoring programme significantly improved therapeutic compliance compared to standard care (92% vs 74%; P=0.0001) in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.
Why the study?
Does a home blood pressure monitoring programme improve therapeutic compliance in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension?
RCT (n=250)
Randomly selected
Yes
Does a home blood pressure monitoring programme improve therapeutic compliance in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension?
A home blood pressure monitoring program significantly improves medication compliance in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports incorporating home BP monitoring into mild-to-moderate hypertension care; reinforces RCT evidence for adherence gains.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a programme of home blood pressure measurement (HBPM) on therapeutic compliance in mild-to-moderate hypertension. DESIGN: A prospective controlled multicentre clinical trial. SETTING: Forty primary care centres in Spain, with a duration of 6 months. PATIENTS: A total of 250 patients with newly diagnosed or uncontrolled hypertension were included. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were randomly selected and distributed in two groups: (1) the control group (CG) who received standard health intervention; (2) the intervention group (IG): the patients in this group received an OMRON in their homes for a programme of HBPM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Four visits were scheduled, for the measurement of blood pressure (BP). They were provided with an electronic monitor for measuring compliance (monitoring events medication system; MEMS). Therapeutic compliance was defined as a drug consumption of 80-110%. A number of variables were calculated using the MEMS. The mean BP were calculated and the percentage of controlled patients. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients completed the study (100 in each group). Compliance was observed in 74 and 92%, respectively, in the CG and IG [95% confidence interval (CI) 63.9-84.1 and 86.7-97.3; P = 0.0001], the mean percentage compliances were 87.6 and 93.5% (95% CI 81.2-94 and 80.7-98.3; P = 0.0001), the percentages of correct days were 83.6 and 89.4%, the percentages of subjects who took the medication at the prescribed time were 79.89 and 88.06%, and the levels of therapeutic cover were 86.7 and 93.1%. The number needed to treat to avoid one case of non-compliance was 5.6 patients. The differences in the mean decreases in BP were significant for diastolic BP, with a greater decrease observed in the IG. CONCLUSIONS: An HBPM programme using electronic monitors is effective in improving compliance in arterial hypertension, measured using the MEMS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Contreras et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Mild-to-moderate hypertension (n=250). Home blood pressure measurement (HBPM) programme vs. Standard health intervention was evaluated on Therapeutic compliance (drug consumption of 80-110%) (p=0.0001). A home blood pressure monitoring programme significantly improved therapeutic compliance compared to standard care (92% vs 74%; P=0.0001) in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: