Key result
Intravenous unfractionated heparin after mitral/double mechanical heart valve replacement yielded a 14.8% rate of early thromboembolic events vs 1.3% after aortic replacement (p=0.005).
Why the study?
Does effective early anticoagulation with intravenous unfractionated heparin prevent early thromboembolic events in patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement?
Observational (n=300)
No
Does effective early anticoagulation with intravenous unfractionated heparin prevent early thromboembolic events in patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement?
Early effective anticoagulation with intravenous unfractionated heparin is crucial after mitral mechanical heart valve replacement to prevent high rates of early thromboembolic events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Warrants caution with standard heparin after mitral replacement; leaves open optimal regimens for randomized confirmation.
Objective: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors, including timing and intensity of anticoagulation, of early thromboembolic events (TE) after mechanical heart valve replacement (MHVR) in patients treated by intravenous unfractionated heparin (IVUH). Design: Prospective observational study, conducted between December 2005 and May 2007. Setting: Haemostasis laboratory, surgical intensive care unit and ward in a university hospital. Patients: Three hundred consecutive patients undergoing MHVR. Mitral or double MHVR was performed in 149 patients, and aortic MHVR in 151 patients. Postoperative anticoagulation was achieved with continuous IVUH according to a standardised protocol. The timing of efficient anticoagulation was recorded for each patient. Main outcome measures: The end point was the occurrence of any arterial TE from day 1 to day 30. Transoesophageal echocardiography was systematically performed after mitral MHVR. Results: Early TE occurred in 22 patients (14.8%; 95% CI 9% to 20%) after a mitral or double MHVR and in two patients (1.3%; 95% CI 0% to 3%) after an aortic MHVR (p = 0.005). After adjustment for diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR (aOR) = 3.3; 95% CI 1.0 to 10.9, p = 0.049), and for the presence of predisposing factors (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or bradycardia requiring definitive pacemaker implantation) (aOR = 12.8; 95% CI 3.1 to 53.3, p<0.001), effective anticoagulation on day 3 was a protective factor (aOR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.8, p = 0.018) for early TE after mitral MHVR. Conclusions: Despite the use of IVUH, the rate of early TE after mitral MHVR remained elevated. These results suggest that early effective anticoagulation is required after mitral MHVR, since inappropriate anticoagulation on day 3 was significantly associated with early TE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allou et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Mechanical heart valve replacement (n=300). Intravenous unfractionated heparin vs. Aortic mechanical heart valve replacement (vs mitral or double replacement) was evaluated on Occurrence of any arterial thromboembolic events from day 1 to day 30 (p=0.005). Intravenous unfractionated heparin after mitral/double mechanical heart valve replacement yielded a 14.8% rate of early thromboembolic events vs 1.3% after aortic replacement (p=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: