Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have detected the 158 μm [C ii] line from 12 galaxies at z ∼ 1–2. This is the first survey of this important star formation tracer at redshifts covering the epoch of maximum star formation in the universe and quadruples the number of reported high-z [C ii] detections. The line is very luminous, between <0.024% and 0.65% of the far-infrared (FIR) continuum luminosity of our sources, and arises from photodissociation regions on molecular cloud surfaces. An exception is PKS 0215+015, where half of the [C ii] emission could arise from X-ray-dominated regions near the central active galactic nucleus (AGN). The L[C ii]/LFIR ratio in our star formation-dominated systems is ∼8 times larger than that of our AGN-dominated systems. Therefore this ratio selects for star formation-dominated systems. Furthermore, the L[C ii]/LFIR and L[C ii]/L(CO(1–0)) ratios in our star-forming galaxies and nearby starburst galaxies are the same, so that luminous star-forming galaxies at earlier epochs (z ∼ 1–2) appear to be scaled-up versions of local starbursts entailing kiloparsec-scale starbursts. Most of the FIR and [C ii] radiation from our AGN-dominated sample (excepting PKS 0215+015) also arises from kiloparsec-scale star formation, but with far-UV radiation fields ∼8 times more intense than in our star formation-dominated sample. We speculate that the onset of AGN activity stimulates large-scale star formation activity within AGN-dominated systems. This idea is supported by the relatively strong [O iii] line emission, indicating very young stars, that was recently observed in high-z composite AGN/starburst systems. Our results confirm the utility of the [C ii] line, and in particular, the L[C ii]/L(FIR) and L[C ii]/LCO(1–0) ratios as tracers of star formation in galaxies at high redshifts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stacey et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: