Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Propensity score-matched study reveals regular hemoperfusion improves outcomes in hemodialysis patients, suggesting significant benefits.
Hemoperfusion (HP) is proposed to remove middle molecules inadequately cleared by conventional dialysis, yet its comprehensive benefits across multiple uremic complications remain underexplored. In this propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of 184 maintenance hemodialysis patients, we compared outcomes between 35 patients receiving regular weekly HP and 35 receiving irregular HP (⩽3 times/year) over 2 years. The regular HP group achieved similar blood pressure control (80.0% vs 74.3%) but with significantly lower antihypertensive medication burden (score: 1.9 vs 3.1, p < 0.001). They also demonstrated superior mineral bone disease management, with lower iPTH (288.5 vs 412.3 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and phosphate levels (1.52 vs 1.83 mmol/L, p = 0.002), higher composite target achievement (62.9% vs 42.9%, p = 0.048), and reduced need for phosphate binders and active vitamin D. Notably, regular HP dramatically reduced uremic pruritus requiring medication (gabapentin: 14.3% vs 80.0%, p < 0.001) and dialysis-related encephalopathy (2.9% vs 20.0%, p = 0.024). No increased safety risks were observed. Regular HP offers comprehensive benefits, improving management of hypertension and mineral bone disease while dramatically reducing pruritus and encephalopathy risk, all with a favorable safety profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: