Observational study shows combined hemodialysis and hemoperfusion reduces toxins in maintenance hemodialysis patients, suggesting effectiveness in treatment.
Introduction:This study aimed to observe the reduction rations of the combination therapy of HD with hemoperfusion(HP) on medium molecular toxins and PBUTs in MHD patients. Methods: In this single-center observational study, 38 MHD patients were treated with HD plus HP using the Jafron KHA130 cartridge for 12 weeks. Serum concentrations of β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), indoxyl sulfate (IS), and p-cresyl sulfate (PCS) were measured by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) at baseline and after 12 weeks, and their reduction rates were calculated. Patients were stratified by the number of HP sessions received during the study period: Group A (>4 times/12 weeks, n=16) and Group B (≤4 times/12 weeks, n=22). The reduction ratio of blood β2-MG and PBUTs(PCS, IS) from baseline were compared between the two groups of patients at 12 weeks. Results: After the 12-week study period, significant reductions were observed in serum levels of β2-MG (from 29.72±5.61 to 21.50±6.69 μg/ml, t=5.882, P<0.001; median reduction ratio 30.48%), IS (from 14.04±1.70 to 11.70±1.12 μg/ml, t=7.199, P<0.001; median reduction ratio 14.61%), and PCS (from 8.09±1.58 to 6.63±1.33 μg/ml, t=4.984, P<0.001; median reduction ratio 17.10%). There was no statistically significant difference in the reduction ratio of β2-MG, PCS and IS between Group A and Group B (P>0.05). The treatment was well tolerated, with only three episodes of hypotension that resolved with conservative management. Conclusion: Combined HD and HP therapy was associated with lower serum levels of β2-MG, IS, and PCS in MHD patients, suggesting this modality may represent a viable strategy for achieving reductions in PBUT and medium molecular toxin levels. The relationship between HP session frequency and toxin reduction requires further investigation in adequately powered randomized controlled trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: