Qualitative analysis examines entrepreneurial university dynamics in Shenzhen, suggesting policy implications for sustainable innovation.
This article examines the emergence of entrepreneurial universities within China’s innovation-driven development agenda, with Shenzhen used as a regional case through which to analyse this process. Drawing on the Triple Helix literature and its later Quadruple and Quintuple Helix extensions, this study uses a qualitative case-study design that combines policy and archival analysis, descriptive questionnaire evidence from 132 respondents, and 42 semi-structured interviews with university, industry, government and venture-capital actors. The analysis shows how Shenzhen’s innovation capacity has been built through the interaction of firm-led technological upgrading, enabling municipal governance and a gradual repositioning of universities. Rather than following the university-centred pattern often associated with mature Western innovation systems, Shenzhen displays a hybrid Helix configuration in which universities acquire entrepreneurial functions through talent provision, external partnerships, practice-oriented knowledge exchange and organisational adaptation. This article therefore contributes to debates on entrepreneurial universities by explaining how such institutions can develop in late-developing, industry-led regions where conventional research infrastructure is initially limited. It also offers policy implications for strengthening sustainable university entrepreneurship, cross-sector coordination and regional innovation resilience in emerging economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isabella Weijia Ding (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: