Identifies DNA fragments and develops assays for detecting Globodera rostochiensis, suggesting advancements in biosecurity.
Background Globodera rostochiensis , a potato cyst nematode (PCN) species, is distributed in potato-growing regions across Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. Recognized as a quarantine pest under international phytosanitary frameworks, its detection is critical for biosecurity. Methods This study aimed to identify a G. rostochiensis -specific DNA fragment using comparative genomics and develop both a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based detection assay and a recombinase-aided amplification (RAA)-based isothermal detection assay. Results A 3,572 bp species-specific DNA fragment was identified. Based on this marker, a conventional PCR diagnostic assay and a recombinase-aided amplification coupled with a lateral flow dipstick (RAA-LFD) diagnostic assay were successfully developed. The PCR primer pair GroF1/GroR1 exhibited a detection limit of 200 copies and a sensitivity of 10 copies/μL (5.6 × 10 −2 fg/μL) when amplified over 32 cycles within a 20 μL PCR reaction volume. Three independent experiments demonstrated that DNA from a single larva could be stably detected using the PCR assay. Following reactions with a 25 μL RAA volume and temperature of 37.5 °C for 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min, the detection limit progressively decreased from 5.75 × 10 4 to 5.75 × 10 0 copies. The corresponding sensitivities ranged from 2.3 × 10 3 copies/μL to 2.3 × 10 −1 copies/μL. Across independent experiments, the RAA assay consistently detected DNA equivalent to 10 −2 of a single larva. The RAA-LFD assay achieved 100% diagnostic sensitivity for the detection of G. rostochiensis in infested field soil samples following a 25 min isothermal amplification at 37.5°C. The established RAA-LFD molecular diagnostic assay exhibits marked potential for the field-deployable detection of G. rostochiensis in root zone soil samples, offering rapid turnaround and simplified procedural requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: