Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigated whether moderate, transient whole-body hyperthermia (approximately 39.6 degrees C), if imposed 1 day following a brief episode of forebrain ischemia, would affect the neuropathologic outcome. Forty-two Wistar rats were subjected to either a 5- or 7-minute period of bilateral common carotid artery occlusion plus hypotension (50 mm Hg), or to the equivalent sham procedure. Twenty-four hours later, rats of one subgroup were placed into a hyperthermic chamber containing high-intensity lamps designed to elevate rectal temperature to 39 to 40 degrees C for 3 hours. Normothermic subgroups received the same procedures, but the heating lamps were turned off. Eight days after brain ischemia or the sham procedure, brains were perfusion-fixed, and numbers of ischemic-appearing CA1 pyramidal neurons were counted. In rats with 7-minute forebrain ischemia, delayed hyperthermia increased mean numbers of ischemic neurons by 2.6- to 2.7-fold in all subsectors of area CA1 (p < 0.05, ANOVA). Delayed hyperthermia in 5-minute ischemic rats also tended to increase mean numbers of ischemic neurons (by 11-fold in lateral, 6-fold in middle, and 5-fold in medial CA1 subsectors), but these differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that moderate, transient hyperthermia, even if occurring 1 day after a 7-minute global ischemic insult, exacerbates the extent of ischemic neuronal injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baena et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: