Assesses food frequency questionnaire validity in adults, suggesting its practical use for dietary intake ranking.
A localized food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was developed to capture habitual dietary intake in the Pearl River Delta population. This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility and validity of this FFQ. A total of 219 adults were enrolled in the Pearl River Delta region. In the reproducibility analysis, the participants completed the FFQ twice at a 18-month interval. Validity was assessed using the 24-hour dietary record collected over 9 days across 3 seasons (spring, summer, and winter). For the reproducibility, the ranges of correlation coefficients and kappa values were 0.38 to 0.80 ( P < .001) and 0.29 to 0.50 ( P < .050), respectively. The consistency for the same and adjacent quartiles was over 80% for most nutrients (87%). For the validity, the ranges of correlation coefficients of the crude, energy adjusted, and kappa values between FFQ and 24-hour dietary record were 0.16 to 0.61, 0.16 to 0.39, and 0.25 to 0.36, respectively, and all these values were statistically significant (all P < .050). The consistency for the same and adjacent quartiles was over 70% for most nutrients (91%). The FFQ used in this study demonstrated acceptable reproducibility and validity (except for fiber, vitamin A, vitamin C, and folate), making it a practical instrument for ranking long-term dietary nutrient intake among adults in the Pearl River Delta, South China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: