Quality improvement initiative to enhance first-hour breastfeeding in cesarean deliveries, indicating promising outcomes.
Introduction: Breastfeeding during the golden hour after birth is crucial for establishing successful long-term breastfeeding. Despite the World Health Organization recommendation, according to the National Family Health Survey-5, the first-hour breastfeeding rate in India following cesarean delivery is only 23.9%. We aimed to improve the first-hour breastfeeding rate in stable neonates born through cesarean delivery from the baseline of 9% to 80% within a period of 4 weeks. Methods: This quality improvement initiative was conducted in Southern India during 8 months (April 2022 to November 2022) by a multidisciplinary team comprising doctors and nurses. The baseline first-hour breastfeeding rate among inborn, stable neonates of 34 weeks’ gestation or greater delivered via cesarean section was assessed during a 10-week period. The Point Of Care Quality Improvement model (POCQI_learner_manual_ver 03_2020.pdf) was used to enhance the breastfeeding rate during 4 weeks. Successful change ideas were adopted, and their sustainability was evaluated during the 22-week sustenance period. Results: Out of the 592 neonates delivered by cesarean section at a gestational age of 34 weeks or older, 418 were eligible. The average gestational age and birth weight were 38 weeks (±1.4) and 2916 g (±489), respectively. The first-hour breastfeeding rate increased from a baseline of 9.6% to 100% at the conclusion of the intervention phase, and this was maintained at greater than 90% throughout the sustainability period. Conclusions: This quality improvement initiative enhances healthcare workers’ knowledge, competence, and confidence in immediate first-hour breastfeeding within the operating theater. Further research is required to assess the potential for generalization across diverse units.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amuji et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: