Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows improved symmetry metrics and reduced shaping time in 3D-printed models, suggesting practical advancement in osteotomy techniques.
CT DICOM data from 5 representative mandibular reconstruction cases were segmented to generate digital models of the maxilla, mandible, and fibula, and then 3D printed (PLA). The authors developed a reusable adjustable osteotomy guide (AOG) to translate in-house virtual surgical planning (VSP) measurements (segment lengths and osteotomy angles) into controlled free fibula flap osteotomies without patient-specific printed cutting guides. For each case, duplicate 3D-printed models were allocated to a conventional wire-template technique (CT) without VSP and to the AOG technique guided by in-house VSP (3D Slicer). After simulated mandibular resection and fibula shaping, reconstructions were photographed in standardized views. Symmetry was assessed using predefined right-to-left ratios (a1/a2–h1/h2) measured in ImageJ, and procedure duration from resection to completion of reconstruction was recorded. The AOG technique improved symmetry for the angulus-gnathion distance ratio (b1/b2) compared with CT (median 99 [IQR 2] versus 95 [IQR 3], P =0.043) and for the midline-angulus distance ratio (d1/d2) (median 98 [IQR 4] versus 95 [IQR 4], P =0.041). Procedure duration was shorter with AOG (median 14 [IQR 4] versus 20 [IQR 9] min, P =0.042). On 3D-printed models, an adjustable, reusable osteotomy guide informed by in-house VSP improved selected symmetry metrics and reduced shaping time versus conventional wire templating, suggesting a practical pathway to VSP-informed fibula osteotomies with reduced cost and logistical dependence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
TOPALOĞLU et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: