The organized integration of research competencies into nursing curricula is still a global challenge and is key for preparing professionals to respond to complex clinical contexts, technological advancements, and contemporary societal demands. At the School of Health of the Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, a longitudinal research axis was implemented across the four years of the undergraduate nursing program, involving epistemological foundations, the research process, evidence-based practice, and applied practice. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the design and implementation of the longitudinal axis of research, analyzing institutional indicators of academic success and the progressive development of students’ scientific competencies. Methods: A descriptive documentary study based on institutional data analysis (the number of enrolled students, pass rates, and mean grades in the four research-related curricular units) was conducted, complemented by a review of pedagogical materials produced (two published course booklets: “Research I—From the origin to the dissemination of knowledge” and “Research II—(De)Constructing the Research Process: A Critical and Practical Analysis”) and evidence of scientific dissemination (conference presentations and published articles). Results: A continuous progression in academic performance was observed across the research curricular units, accompanied by increased complexity of student work and enhanced scientific literacy. The sequential structure proved essential: the articulation of epistemology, methodology, critical appraisal, and scientific production demonstrated strong coherence and pedagogical efficiency. Conclusions: The longitudinal research axis constitutes a curricular innovation that strengthens essential scientific competencies in undergraduate nursing education. Longitudinal models that reflect both conceptual and practical progression can significantly contribute to the development of nurses who are critical thinkers, reflective practitioners, and capable of integrating evidence into clinical decision-making.
Nunes et al. (Fri,) studied this question.