This randomized trial analyzes return spillovers between private and public markets, suggesting significant interconnectedness and implications for investors.
We examine how and why return spillovers are transmitted between private and public markets. Using daily data for four private and four public market segments, we apply a Quantile Vector Autoregression (QVAR) framework to capture dynamic, state-dependent spillovers under bearish, neutral, and bullish conditions. The results show substantial and time-varying connectedness, with private markets frequently acting as net transmitters of shocks. Spillovers intensify in both market expansions and contractions, strengthening systemic risk. Macro-financial variables influence spillover magnitude, with explainable AI (XGBoost) identifying inflation as the most important driver, followed by geopolitical risk and economic policy uncertainty. Portfolio analysis further demonstrates that connectedness-informed allocation strategies substantially improve risk-adjusted performance compared to traditional portfolios. These findings challenge the perception of private markets as insulated from public market dynamics and highlight the need to incorporate macroeconomic conditions into asset allocation, hedging, and stress-testing frameworks. By integrating private markets into the spillover literature, we extend portfolio theory and provide actionable insights for investors and policymakers navigating increasingly interconnected financial systems. • Analyse dynamic spillovers between private and public markets. • Private markets frequently act as net transmitters of shocks to public markets. • Spillovers are state-dependent, intensifying in both bullish and bearish periods. • Inflation is identified as the most influential feature of spillover intensity. • Findings provide insights for portfolio diversification, hedging, and systemic risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aslam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: