In Vitro study reveals zinc-modified glass ionomer cements impact biofilm formation and tooth demineralization, indicating potential dental applications.
Background: Biofilm formation and associated tooth demineralization are key factors influencing the clinical performance of dental materials. Methods: This study compared the antibiofilm and demineralization preventive effects of two zinc-modified glass ionomer cements (Zn-GICs) with a conventional GIC. Disk-shaped specimens of Caredyne Restore (CR), ChemFil Rock (CFR), and Ketac Molar (KM) (n = 6) were evaluated in a multi-species biofilm model using an oral biofilm reactor. Early biofilm formation was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (after 2 h and 4 h), bacterial accumulation and water-insoluble glucan (WIG) production were quantified (after 12 h). For demineralization assessment, restored human enamel and dentin specimens (n = 6) including an additional resin-based control group (Dura Seal, DS) were subjected to a 14-day biofilm challenge and lesion depth was measured using swept-source optical coherence tomography and confocal microscopy. Results: CR showed significantly lower bacterial accumulation and WIG production than the other materials (p < 0.05). CFR demonstrated lower bacterial levels than KM (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed between CFR and KM in WIG production (p > 0.05). CR produced the shallowest enamel and dentin lesions, whereas DS exhibited the deepest (p < 0.05); however, no statistically significant differences were observed between CFR and KM in lesion depth (p > 0.05). Conclusions: CR demonstrated superior biofilm suppression and reduced demineralization, whereas CFR showed limited differences compared with the conventional GIC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bozyer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: