Examines how gender roles mediate risk-taking differences in a large student sample, suggesting nuanced influences on behavior.
Risk-taking propensity is a key factor behind decisions spanning economics, finance or health. Studies show males tend to take more risk than females, albeit reasons remain debated. The authors investigate this on a large student sample (n = 3,236), examining whether a gender measure (BEM-sex role inventory) mediates the relationship between biological sex and risk taking. As per previous studies, males report more risk in driving, finance, sports, work and health. The authors find no difference in social trust decisions. Mediation analysis offers a more nuanced perspective. Being male drives masculinity up. In turn, masculinity is linked to risk-taking (driving, finance, sport, work), but feminity is also related to work risk. Feminity reduces driving risk. Trust risk-taking is unique, as it is driven up by feminity, and down by masculinity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bertrand et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: