PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Surface Engineering0 citations

Effect of gun traverse speed on tribological properties of HVAF sprayed high entropy alloy coatings

View Full Paper
NBNarendra BabuMetallurgical Research InstituteSKSyamkumar KizhuveettilAmal Jyothi College of EngineeringSGSumanth GovindarajanNational Institute of Technology Karnataka

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how different gun traverse speeds affect the properties of high-entropy alloy coatings.
  • High-velocity air fuel (HVAF) spraying of FeCoCrNiAl and FeCoCrNiMn on IN718 substrates at traverse speeds of 600, 800, and 1000 mm/s.
  • Assessment of porosity, surface roughness, microhardness, and wear rates of the coatings after deposition.
  • Testing included scratch tests and Raman spectroscopy to analyze oxide content.
  • Higher gun traverse speeds led to denser coatings and increased microhardness by ∼23% at 1000 mm/s versus 600 mm/s.
  • Wear rates reduced by ∼20% for HEAL and 11% for HEAM at higher traverse speeds, indicating improved tribological performance.
  • HEAL had greater hardness, while HEAM exhibited better cohesion and adhesion strength.

Abstract

In this study, two high-entropy alloys (HEA), FeCoCrNiAl (HEAL) and FeCoCrNiMn (HEAM), were deposited on IN718 substrates by the high velocity air fuel (HVAF) technique at gun traverse speeds (GTS) of 600, 800, and 1000 mm/s. Lower GTS resulted in relatively higher levels of porosity and surface roughness due to consolidation of weakly bonded particles with inadequate flattening however with the advantage of higher deposition efficiency. Higher speeds produced dense coatings, but with lower deposition efficiency. Raman spectroscopy indicated that the oxide content in the coatings decreased as the GTS increased. The microhardness showed an increase of up to ∼23% at 1000 mm/s compared to 600 mm/s for both coatings. Scratch tests demonstrated higher cohesion and adhesion strength as gun traverse speed increased. Though HEAL showed higher hardness compared to HEAM, the latter showed better cohesion and adhesion. Coatings at 1000 mm/s exhibited lower friction and a reduced wear rate compared to those at 800 mm/s. At room temperature, wear is more pronounced and abrasive, while at elevated temperatures, wear became progressively oxidative. The wear rates of both HEA coatings deposited at higher GTS demonstrated reductions of ∼20% and 11%, respectively. Alumina in HEAL and manganese-chromium oxide complexes in HEAM play a key role in determining the wear rates at higher temperatures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Babu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c2c7880e6d24efe2253https://doi.org/10.1177/02670844261439685
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper