PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026United European Gastroenterology Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Later‐Stage Diagnosis and Poorer Survival in Pancreatic Cancer Patients With Vague Symptoms: A Population‐Based Study

View Full Paper
VPVinay Murali PrasadHCHelen G. ColemanSHSinead T. Hawkins

Key Points

  • This research examines how presenting symptoms affect diagnosis routes, disease stage, treatment, and survival in pancreatic cancer patients.
  • Analyzed 512 pancreatic cancer cases from Northern Ireland Cancer Registry audit (2019–2020) excluding 28 due to insufficient data.
  • Categorized patients based on presenting symptoms as alarm symptoms (AS) or vague symptoms (VS).
  • Used statistical tests including χ², Kaplan-Meier, Log-Rank, and Cox proportional hazards models to assess differences and mortality risk.
  • 60.4% of patients presented with vague symptoms, with emergency admission more common in alarm symptoms patients (66.0% vs. 33.7%, p < 0.001).
  • 62.1% of vague symptoms patients had stage IV disease compared to 39.9% of alarm symptoms patients (p < 0.001).
  • One-year survival was worse in vague symptoms patients (24.9% vs. 33.7%, p = 0.001), with a 48% increased mortality risk for vague symptoms (HR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.14–1.91).

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Most pancreatic cancer (PC) patients present symptomatically to cancer services, are diagnosed at late stage, and have poor survival. Patients with alarm symptoms (AS), such as jaundice or altered stool/urine colour, may be more readily recognised within current referral pathways than those with vague symptoms (VS). Objective To examine the associations of presenting symptom category (alarm vs. vague) with route to diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival in PC patients. Methods Of 540 primary PC cases identified in the population‐based Northern Ireland Cancer Registry PC Audit (2019–2020), 28 were excluded because referral pathway information was insufficient to classify route to diagnosis, leaving 512 patients for analysis. Patients were categorised by presenting symptoms as AS or VS. χ 2 tests assessed group differences; Kaplan‐Meier and Log‐Rank tests compared 1‐year survival. Cox proportional hazards models compared mortality risk, adjusting for sex, age, socioeconomic status, referral route, tumour location, and stage at diagnosis. All statistical tests were two‐sided, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results More patients presented with VS (60.4%) than AS (39.6%). Emergency admission was more common in AS than in VS patients (66.0% vs. 33.7%, p < 0.001). VS patients more often had stage IV disease (62.1% vs. 39.9%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to receive tumour‐reductive treatment (34.0% vs. 50.2%, p < 0.001). One‐year survival was poorer in VS than in AS patients (24.9% vs. 33.7%, p = 0.001). VS was associated with a 48% increased mortality risk HR = 1.48 (1.14–1.91) after full adjustment. Conclusion PC patients with VS were more often presented via GP; they had later‐stage disease and poorer survival. VS remained independently associated with poorer survival. Greater awareness of PC symptoms, especially VS, together with effective diagnostic pathways for non‐specific symptoms, may help support more timely investigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Prasad et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c3f7880e6d24efe24b3https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70231
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper