PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Earth and Space Science1 citationsOpen Access

Research on Polar Motion Prediction Accuracy Based on ETH and GFZ Angular Momentum Forecast Products

View Full Paper
XLXishun LiChinese Academy of SciencesYWY N WuKing UniversityQKQiaoli KongShandong University of Science and Technology

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the polar motion prediction accuracy of ETH and GFZ angular momentum forecast products.
  • Systematically assessed the performance differences between ETH's 14-day and GFZ's 10-day products.
  • Examined accuracy evolution of PMX and PMY predictions from May 2023 to December 2024.
  • Compared results against International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) forecasts.
  • ETH's product achieves a maximum improvement of 13.84% for PMX forecasts across all lead times of 1–90 days.
  • GFZ's product shows higher accuracy for PMY at shorter lead times (1–13 days), with ETH outperforming beyond 14 days.
  • ETH's product improves upon IERS forecasts by up to 43.43% for PMX and by up to 35.45% for PMY within 31 days.

Abstract

Abstract Polar motion (PM), a critical element of Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP), is essential for high‐precision applications such as deep space exploration and satellite navigation. Recent advances in prediction methods utilizing Effective Angular Momentum (EAM) data have become a key pathway for enhancing PM forecast accuracy. Focusing on two operational EAM forecast products—the 14‐day product from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich) and the 10‐day product from the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ)—this study systematically evaluates their performance differences and optimal application scenarios in PM prediction over the period from May 2023 to December 2024. Our analysis examines both the intrinsic accuracy of each product and the resulting accuracy evolution of PMX and PMY predictions. The results reveal complementary strengths: GFZ's product achieves higher accuracy in short‐term forecasts, whereas ETH's product demonstrates superior performance in medium‐to‐long‐term predictions. Specifically for PMX, ETH's product outperforms GFZ's across all 1–90 day lead times, with a maximum improvement of 13.84% and an average gain exceeding 8%; compared to concurrent International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) forecasts, the improvement reaches up to 43.43%. For PMY, GFZ's product is more accurate at shorter lead times (1–13 days), while ETH's performs better beyond 14 days, notably outperforming the IERS Daily product by up to 35.45% within 31 days. This research provides a scientific basis for selecting EAM data in PM prediction, offering valuable insights for optimizing PM forecasting systems and supporting high‐precision remote sensing satellite missions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c5d7880e6d24efe279fhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2026ea005028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper