Critiques reflective practice in education, suggesting a return to its ethical roots to promote teacher flourishing.
Purpose This study critiques the disenchantment of contemporary reflective practice from an antique three-dimensional ethics to a shibboleth in professional education comprising an epistemology of decision-making, a techne for production, and even a neoliberal governance technology. Design/Approach/Methods Following a Foucauldian analysis of the change of truth and subjectivity in the Greco-Roman , Christianity, and post- Cartesian epochs, this study presents how reflection, once a “care of the self” technology to forge “spiritual corporality,” was overshadowed by the philosophy of “knowing yourself,” eventually being disenchanted into a secularized tool. Findings With the aim of re-enchanting reflective practice as Aristotelian virtue-phronesis in teacher education, we appeal to teachers to become students’ in loco parentis as a form of flourishing. Originality/Value This study philosophically interrogates reflective practice, which is often uncritically regarded as a self-evidently golden practice in teacher professional development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: