From Forest Land Easements to Broader Conservation Agreements : An Analysis of Pathways to Community Support in China’s National Park Pilot

Conservation easements (CEs) represent a complex policy instrument designed to mediate the feedback loops within coupled human and natural systems in protected areas. However, their efficacy is often constrained by a lack of systemic understanding of the localized drivers of community support. Building upon the successful implementation of Forest Land Easements (FLEs) within China’s Qianjiangyuan National Park Pilot, this study investigates the potential to expand this policy model to other land types. This study investigates the multilevel factors influencing residents’ willingness to adopt three types of CEs, including forest land (FLE), agricultural land (ALE) and homestead land (HLE) easements in China’s Qianjiangyuan National Park Pilot, the country’s primary CE reform site. We conceptualize a hierarchical support model wherein community participation (CP) and human well-being (HW) interact with support for park management (SM), forming a subsystem that drives decisions within the broader land-use. Utilizing structural equation modelling (SEM) and stepwise regression analysis on survey data from 336 households, we tested this model. The results reveal that SM acts as a critical direct mediator and positive driver of CE acceptance, while CP and HW exert significant indirect effects through SM, demonstrating a key feedback pathway. Regression analyses further elucidate that support for different CE types is driven by distinct configurations of factors, highlighting the heterogeneous nature of subsystems. Notably, livelihood benefits and prior participation experiences emerged as consistent, cross-cutting systemic leverages. It demonstrates that leveraging the implementation experience and community support gained from existing forest land easements is crucial. This study concludes that effective CE design must move beyond one-size-fits-all approaches. It necessitates differentiated, adaptive policies that are coherently aligned with local livelihood subsystems and strategically strengthen participatory feedback mechanisms initiated by successful FLEs. Our findings provide an evidence-based framework for designing resilient, socially sustainable conservation policies in complex protected area systems, grounded in proven practice.