Short reply defends philosophical account of claim-rights against critiques, clarifying misunderstandings.
Simon Franz Ewers, in the pages of this journal, has recently undertaken a critique of my philosophical account of the holding of claim-rights. In this short response to Ewers, I defend that account against some significant misrepresentations or misapprehensions in Ewers’s article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew H. Kramer (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: