Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates aztreonam/avibactam plus fosfomycin against NDM-producing Pseudomonas, suggesting a potential treatment alternative.
In India, most carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains produce metallo-β lactamases, and cefiderocol, the sole reliable treatment option, is currently not available. This study evaluated aztreonam/avibactam with fosfomycin as an alternative in 85 MBL-producing isolates. Aztreonam/avibactam and fosfomycin inhibited 7.1% and 27.1% of isolates at 8 and 32 mg/L, respectively, while cefiderocol at 4 mg/L inhibited 78.8%. Time-kill assays on 10 isolates showed synergy in 7/10 and enhanced activity in 6/10 with the combination versus monotherapy. These findings warrant further in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies to evaluate the therapeutic potential of aztreonam/avibactam plus fosfomycin against MBL-producing P. aeruginosa. • In India, MBL-producing P. aeruginosa are widely prevalent • Safe treatment options for MBL-Pseudomonas infections are extremely limited • Aztreonam/avibactam or fosfomycin alone were not cidal • For majority of isolates, aztreonam/avibactam and fosfomycin combination were cidal
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nelson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: