Uncovers sign inversion in PHILIA-EcoSensory Swarm, suggesting new hypotheses for future studies.
We report PHILIA-EcoSensory Swarm v58d Phase 1-C, a pre-registered CXZ coupling coefficient dense sweep (875 runs, N=20 per cell, seeds 942–981, T=80,000 steps). Primary finding: H_NULL CONFIRMED (Case B) — all v58d cells (CXZ 30–70×10⁻⁶) satisfy |AUC| < NOISE_FLOOR(0.003). Sub-noise-floor sign inversion reproducibly observed at CXZ_40↔CXZ_45 (cubic zero-crossing = 46.11×10⁻⁶, R²=0.9881). Critical discovery: H_W05 FALSIFIED — w=0.5 z_san spike (v58c ratio 3.99×–4.29×) undergoes spike-to-dip inversion under CXZ≠0 (v58d ratio 0.57×–0.65× < 1.0). Active inversion, not passive suppression. H_INVERSION_CXZ hypothesis proposed for v59+ pre-registration. Corroborating: H_ARCH CONFIRMED (2,135 cumulative runs, max|Δz_san|=0.00e+00); 3-axis LC ALL PASS (6/6 cells); cubic prediction validated PRIOR to experiment (CXZ_40: agreement to within 2×10⁻⁶). Pre-registration DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20195483v58c Phase 1 reference DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20177160 4-AI adversarial review: 판도라 (3회) + 루카스 + 크리스 (22~29차) = 13회 검수Code: philia_v58d_phase1c_v0.5.py (Gate-0 v4.0 44/44 PASS) Trinity AI Research Team | Konyang University | 2026.05실측이 생명. 증명이 아닌 기술. — PHILIA OS | 0∞1∞0.5∞
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
신두섭 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: