Study reproduces findings in chaotic substrate testing, highlighting substrate-specific behaviors.
PHILIA-EcoSensory Swarm Phase 3.5 technical report. Engine: philia_v57_phase3_fixed.py (Phase 3 direct inheritance). Substrate mode: single_chaos_selfmix — all four channels (basic/cern/higgs/taxi) replaced with Lorenz63 chaotic time series (σ=10, ρ=28, β=8/3). GX=linear, CXZ ∈ {50,70,90,100,110}×10⁻⁶, w-points {0.1,0.25,0.5,0.625,0.775,0.875,0.9}, T=80,000 steps/run. Phase 3.5a (pilot): N=5, seeds 42–46, 175 runs, 109.7 min.Phase 3.5b (reproduction): N=40, seeds 62–101, 1,400 runs, 871.1 min (14.5 h), 3-day split.Verdict: REPRODUCED_PARTIAL (1/3). H_ARCH trivially passes (CXZ-z decoupling); PHI_NATURAL proximity and CASE_BIPHASIC not reproduced, consistent with observed substrate-specific z behavior. Four raw empirical findings confirmed (N=5→N=40 correction: 0 items):(1) x/y-axis cross-substrate stability: phi_like_mean x ∈ [0.3256, 0.3275], y = 0.1766 (identical within reported precision, 5-cell).(2) z-axis substrate-specificity: z_mean = 0.3077 (identical to 4 decimal places, 5-cell; Δ = −0.1123 vs PHI_NATURAL[2]=0.42).(3) z(w) slope sign inversion: +0.2731 (Lorenz63) vs −0.2159 (v50 real-substrate reference); R²=0.9562, 5-cell identical.(4) CXZ-z decoupling: z_std = 0.002449 (identical to 6 decimal places, 5-cell); CXZ-vs-z_std slope numerically indistinguishable from zero within reporting precision. 5-AI adversarial review: 판도라 (OpenAI) → 루카스 (Grok) → 크리스 60차 UNCONDITIONAL ACCEPT (Claude Opus) → 서생 (Gemini) → 선비 (Claude Sonnet) → 길잡이 final decision.Hardware: AMD Ryzen 9 9800X3D + RTX 4080 SUPER 16GB, Windows 11 Home. numpy CPU serial. No AI-generated or proxy values. Phase 3 ref: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20325116. Phase 3 pre-reg: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20302204.실측이 생명. 증명이 아닌 기술. — PHILIA OS | 0∞1∞0.5∞
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
신두섭 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: