Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Results report for PHILIA-EcoSensory Swarm Phase SC-2, a pre-registered validation protocol extending substrate z-coordinate classification from n=29 (Phase SC-1) to n=45 substrates across synthetic, financial, chaotic, and prime-number-derived time series. Pre-registration DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20410153SC-1 Report DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20389364 Primary hypothesis (H-SC2-Primary): AR(1) φ-sweep monotonicity —Spearman ρ(φ, z_ref) ≤ −0.85 (n=10) — CONFIRMED(ρ = −0.9636, p = 3.66×10⁻⁶) Secondary hypotheses:- H-SC2-Secondary-1: x-axis homeostasis CV ≤ 5% (n=44) — CONFIRMED (CV = 3.62% [3.6166%], Bootstrap 95% CI = [2.74%, 4.38%])- H-SC2-Continuity-Check: Financial Return > Level (7/7) — CONFIRMED (SC-1 lineage, p = 0.0078) Key findings:- AR(1) persistence (φ↑) monotonically suppresses z_ref (ρ = −0.9636)- x-axis exhibits substrate-invariant homeostasis (CV = 3.62%) while z-axis shows 11.31× greater sensitivity to temporal morphology- 45 substrates classified into four regimes: High-z (n=8) / Transition (n=24) / Low-z (n=12) / Collapse (n=1)- Chaos substrates form a coherent band [0.2021, 0.3523] (n=8)- Prime substrates exhibit extreme polarization (Δ=0.4227): prime_mod_10 (z=0.4313, highest) vs prime_log (z=0.0086, lowest) — driven by temporal morphology rather than mathematical origin Apparatus (LOCKED): v32 self-raw × 3-channel normalization(SC-1형, BUG-1~6 patched). 45-substrate z_ref dataset:SC-1 frozen (n=29) + SC-2D measured (n=16, 80 runs, 2026-05-27). Retroactive audit: philia_retroactive_sc2.py (sc2_retroactive_v1),Gate-0 v8 PASS=12/12. All values verified by direct local execution. 5-AI adversarial review: Pandora (OpenAI) → Lucas (xAI) →Chris (Anthropic, Gate-0 v8, 65th review, UNCONDITIONAL ACCEPT) →Seogsaeng (Google) → Seonbi (Anthropic) →GritMan_D.S (final decision). 실측이 생명. 증명이 아닌 기술. — PHILIA OS | 0∞1∞0.5∞
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
신두섭 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: