May 17, 2026Insights into Imaging0 citationsOpen Access

Decoding collaboration obstacles: a survey on reporting preferences between neuroradiologists and clinical specialists

Q: What does this research mean for the field?

Clinicians prefer context-based structured radiology reports with standardized classifications and key images, whereas neuroradiologists predominantly prefer conventional reporting formats. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

FGFelix GunzerUniversity Hospital of Zurich GBGiovanna BrandiUniversity of Zurich RSReza SeiffertUniversity of Lucerne

Key Points

To quantify reporting preferences and communication barriers between neuroradiologists and neuro-associated clinicians at a tertiary neuroscience center.
Two near-identical, multilingual online surveys were distributed to neuroradiologists and clinicians in neurology, neurosurgery, and otorhinolaryngology.
Surveys included demographic questions, satisfaction assessments, and report-related preferences.
Data analysis involved descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages.
45.8% of clinicians preferred context-based structured reports in stroke scenarios, while only 9.5% of neuroradiologists preferred this format.
59.3% endorsed the use of standardized classifications and quantitative measurements, and 89.8% found key images useful in reports.
No significant difference in impact ratings was observed between groups with p = 0.25.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To quantify reporting preferences and communication barriers between neuroradiologists and neuro-associated clinicians at a tertiary neuroscience center. Materials and methods Two near-identical, multilingual online surveys (17 questions) were distributed to neuroradiologists and clinicians in neurology, neurosurgery, and otorhinolaryngology. The surveys included demographic questions, satisfaction assessments, and report-related preferences. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages). Results Responses were obtained from 80 physicians (21 neuroradiologists; 59 clinicians). Most clinicians reported reading the entire report (59.3%); subspecialty differences were not significant (chi-square test, p = 0.59). In a stroke scenario, context-based structured reports were preferred by 45.8% of clinicians, in contrast to only by 9.5% of neuroradiologists. Standardized classifications and quantitative measurements were endorsed often/always by 59.3%, and key images were considered useful routinely or in complex cases by 89.8% of clinicians. For the clinical neuro-related subspecialties, no significant between-group difference in impact ratings was observed (chi-square test, p = 0.25). Neuroradiologists indicated that more detailed clinical information would be beneficial. Conclusion Clinicians favor context-based structured reporting with classifications, quantitative measurements, and key images, whereas neuroradiologists predominantly prefer conventional formats. Adopting context-based templates with clear governance may help align expectations and support interdisciplinary workflows. Critical relevance statement More focused and detailed clinical information, together with greater use of context-based structured reports incorporating classifications, quantitative measurements, and key images, may facilitate clearer communication between radiologists and clinicians and better support tailored clinical decision-making workflows. Key Points Interdisciplinary reporting needs in neuroradiology were assessed by surveys. Clinicians favor context-based structured reports and standardized content. Referral quality and report design are modifiable barriers to improving workflow. Graphical Abstract

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper