This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The utilisation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) mounted with non-metric consumer-grade digital cameras is on the rise globally due to their affordability and ease of operation. For high-accuracy UAV products, accurate camera parameters must be determined through camera calibration. Camera calibration can be performed before (pre-calibration) or during the bundle block adjustment (self-calibration). This study aims to analyse the effect of camera calibration parameters on the accuracy of UAV products, namely the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and orthoimage. Camera calibration parameters are estimated using self-calibration, which deploys 3D image information of the scene in a bundle adjustment, and a 2D reference object-based approach known as Zhang's technique, which requires image information of a planar pattern. This study deployed a DJI FC220 camera mounted on a DJI Mavic Pro UAV. Self-calibration was deployed in Agisoft Metashape software based on Brown's method, and Zhang's technique was deployed in MATLAB and OpenCV. Based on internal accuracy measures, OpenCV yields a minor reprojection error of 0.14, followed by MATLAB (0.79) and self-calibration (1.21). Processing without calibration yields the highest reprojection error of 2.18. Based on external measures of accuracy, that is, the geometric accuracy of UAV products, self-calibration yields the least RMSE of 8.2 and 1.4 cm for the horizontal and vertical, respectively, followed by Zhang's technique with 9.6 and 2.3 cm in MATLAB and 13.5 and 4.3 cm in OpenCV. Processing without calibration yields the highest vertical RMSE of 20.0 and 22.9 cm for the horizontal and vertical, respectively. Comparison of the accuracy of UAV mapping products computed with and without calibration emphasises the need for camera calibration to optimise the accuracy of UAV products. This study recommends assessing other photogrammetric mapping software and camera calibration approaches and the effect of flying heights on calibration parameters and mapping accuracy
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abeho et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: