The purpose of this classroom-based experiment was to explore methods for helping students generate conceptual mathematical explanations during peer-mediated learning activities. Participants were 40 general education classrooms in grades 2, 3, and 4, which were assigned randomly to 3 treatments: peer-mediated instruction (PMI) with training in how to offer and receive elaborated help (PMI-Elaborated); PMI with training in elaborated help and in methods for providing conceptual mathematical explanations (PMI-Elaborated + Conceptual); and contrast (i.e., no PMI). Teachers implemented PMI treatments for 18 weeks with their naturally constituted mathematics classes. From each of the 40 classes, we pre- and posttested the mathematics achievement of 4 students who represented 4 points on the achievement continuum. We also coded student interactions from tutoring generalization sessions videotaped 10 weeks after all training had been completed. Analyses revealed that PMI-Elaborated + Conceptual tutors asked more participatory, procedural questions and provided more conceptual explanations. Moreover, the achievement of PMI-Elaborated + Conceptual students was higher than that of PMI-Elaborated students, which in turn surpassed that of the contrast group. Findings are discussed in terms of teachers' use of collaborative learning methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuchs et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: