Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Glofitamab is a T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody with a novel 2:1 configuration that confers bivalency for CD20 (B cells) and monovalency for CD3 (T cells). In an ongoing Phase I/II study (NCT03075696), glofitamab demonstrated durable complete responses (CR) and a favorable safety profile in patients (pts) with R/R B-cell lymphomas (Phase I dose-escalation part; Hutchings, et al. 2021) and in pts with R/R DLBCL (pivotal Phase II expansion). Aims: To evaluate tumor and peripheral blood (PB) biomarkers associated with clinical response to glofitamab in the pivotal Phase II expansion. Methods: Pts with DLBCL (DLBCL, NOS, HGBCL, PMBCL, or trFL; n=107) and ≥2 prior therapies received intravenous (IV) obinutuzumab pretreatment (Gpt; 1000mg) 7 days before the first glofitamab dose. IV glofitamab was then given as step-up doses on Day (D) 1 (2.5mg) and D8 (10mg) of Cycle (C) 1 and at the target dose (30mg) on D1 of C2–12 (21-day cycles). Response was assessed by Independent Review Committee (Lugano 2014 criteria). All pts provided informed consent. Baseline (BL) tumor biopsies were assessed by CD20/PAX5 immunohistochemistry (n=64) and CD8/Ki67 immunofluorescence (IF) (n=61). PB biomarkers were evaluated by flow cytometry (n=87) and plasma cytokines by ELISA (n=70). Immune and stromal cell type were inferred from bulk tumor RNAseq samples (n=55) using xCell cell type enrichment analysis. All BL samples were collected prior to Gpt. Results: Analysis of BL tumor biopsies showed all pts were CD20 positive (range: ~35–98% CD20+ PAX5+ B cells) and CD20 levels were not associated with response. A trend towards higher CD8 counts was observed in pts with CR (by IF in total CD8 and CD8+Ki67- T cells). Gene expression analysis showed that responders had higher tumor microenvironment abundance enrichment scores, including higher CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets scores (Figure). PB immune profiling revealed a positive association of BL counts of B cells (p<0.01), CD4 T cells (p=0.02), and CD4 effector memory (EM) cells (p=0.03) with response. There were no significant differences in BL counts of CD8 subsets, regulatory T cells, natural killer cells or monocytes. In pts with progressive disease (PD), there was a trend towards higher expression of the checkpoint marker PD1 on CD8 cells (p=0.05). Pts with CR had lower levels of IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) at BL (test for association with CR: p=0.1 and p=0.01, respectively). Early on-treatment changes in PB were associated with response to glofitamab: induction of IL-6, IFNγ, IL-10, and TNFα in the 6 hours after the first glofitamab dose was strongest in pts with CR (IL-6, IFNγ, IL-10: 6- to 16-fold induction; TNFα: 1.5-fold induction). Transient margination of CD4 and CD8 T cells was strongest in pts with CR. Additional analyses, including ctDNA, are ongoing and updated data will be presented. Image:Summary/Conclusion: Biomarker results from the expansion cohort in pts with R/R DLBCL were consistent with those from the dose-escalation (Broeske et al. 2021), including comparable BL tumor CD20 expression across response categories, a trend towards higher BL tumor CD8 levels in pts with CR, and lower BL IL-6 and CRP in pts with CR. T-cell margination was strongest in pts with CR. Several novel response-associated biomarkers were identified in PB including higher BL B cell, CD4, and CD4 EM counts in responders and higher PD1 expression on CD8 in pts with PD. These data suggest a model where the clinical activity of glofitamab may be dependent upon immune contexture in the tumor and PB at the start of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piccione et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: