Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sato, Yoji, Max Harry Weil, Wanchun Tang, Shijie Sun, Jianlin Xie, Joe Bisera, and Hidehiro Hosaka. Esophageal[Formula: see text] as a monitor of perfusion failure during hemorrhagic shock. J. Appl. Physiol. 82(2): 558–562, 1997.—Measurement of gastric wall [Formula: see text]([Formula: see text]) by tonometric method has emerged as an attractive option for estimating visceral perfusion during circulatory shock. However, gastric acid secretion obfuscates the tonometric measurement. We, therefore, investigated the option of measuring[Formula: see text] in the esophagus to minimize these restraints. Hemorrhagic shock was induced in five Sprague-Dawley rats, and five rats served as sham controls.[Formula: see text] was measured with an ion-sensitive field effect transistor that was surgically implanted into the gastric wall. Esophageal luminal[Formula: see text]([Formula: see text]) was measured by a second ion-sensitive field effect transistor sensor. During hemorrhagic shock, mean aortic pressure declined from 150 to 50 mmHg. Gastric blood flow decreased from 58 to 12 ml ⋅ min −1 ⋅ 100 g −1 (21% of preshock) and esophageal blood flow from 44 to 7 ml ⋅ min −1 ⋅ 100 g −1 (16% of preshock).[Formula: see text]simultaneously increased from 47 to 116 Torr and[Formula: see text] from 47 to 127 Torr. The increases in[Formula: see text] were highly correlated with increases in[Formula: see text]( r = 0.90). Esophageal tonometry may, therefore, serve as a practical alternative to gastric tonometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: