Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An aspect of the measurement selection problem-the existence of anomalous orderings on the probability of error obtained by selected subsets of measurements-is discussed. It is shown that for any ordering on the probability of error as a function of the subset of measurements (subject to an obvious set monotonicity condition), there exists a multivariate normal two-hypothesis problem N(μ,K) versus N(μ,K) that exhibits this ordering. Thus no known nonexhaustive sequential k-measurement selection procedure is optimal, even for jointly normal measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cover et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: