Computational modeling demonstrates distinct failure dynamics under cyber-physical and weather threats in multi-layer infrastructures, highlighting critical vulnerabilities to targeted attacks.
This study presents a novel framework that integrates dynamic multi-layer graph theory with cascading failure dynamics to analyze the resilience and reliability of multi-layer network infrastructures. These infrastructures include critical systems such as power grids, which are inherently susceptible to cascading failures due to their complex, interconnected structures. Our research introduces a sophisticated model that dynamically captures the multi -dimensional interactions of the systems across various scales. Each layer of the network, from physical components to control systems, is continually updated with real-time operational data and historical incident records, enhancing the model's predictive accuracy and responsiveness to emerging threats. The core of our multi-scale system reliability analysis is the evaluation of Node-Centric and Edge-Centric Subgraph Reliability Metrics (N-SRM and E-SRM), examining both intra-layer and inter-layer dynamics. Through extensive simulations under two critical scenarios-cyber-physical attacks and extreme weather conditions-we quantitatively assessed the network's resilience. For cyber-physical attacks, rapid propagation of failures was observed, significantly impacting the network's operational integrity. The N-SRM values across the layers exhibited steep declines within a short duration, demonstrating pronounced susceptibility to these attacks. In contrast, the impact of extreme weather was characterized by a gradual decline in reliability, suggesting a robustness that allows for effective adaptation strategies over an extended period. In addition, the inter-layer connections, particularly in Scenario B, demonstrated higher resilience with slower rates of reliability decline, underscoring the structural integrity and operational capability of the network.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huynh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: