Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This editorial argues the cause-and-effect relationship between in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) and incidence of vaginal adenocarcinoma among young women. It is conjectured that the mechanism by which DES induces tumors is a result of transplacental carcinogenesis; i.e., DES causes a malignant change in any fetal cell of future vaginal tissue, resulting in a genetic defect which may not be realized until puberty, when endogenous hormone production acts as a promoter of the malignancy initiated by DES exposure during gestation. If this theory is correct, local progestational therapy may arrest future adenocarcinoma cases. Though it is obvious that DES therapy must be avoided in the future in the population of pregnant women, of more concern is the presence of residual DES in foodstuffs, particularly livestock meat. A ban of such diet supplementation of human foodstuffs is called for.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judah Folkman (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: