Theoretical analysis reveals that delegation affirms supreme power rather than diminishing state sovereignty, suggesting political institutions cannot permanently bind sovereign authority.
The concept of sovereignty shapes our understanding of the world. Yet our current understanding of sovereignty conflates delegation of authority with loss of sovereignty. Delegation is relatively cheap, quick, and leads to an assured outcome; it’s an affirmation of sovereignty. Use of force, however, is required to regain lost sovereignty. I propose a definition of sovereignty that draws a clear distinction between sovereignty and delegated authority. Adopting this definition shows that sovereignty applies across time and space, it is indivisible, institutions do not place permanent constraints on supreme authority, and popular sovereignty is not a well-grounded concept.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mariya Grinberg (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: