Key result
Ongoing STENO INTEN-CT trial tests if CAC-guided multifactorial treatment reduces cardiovascular events in T2D.
Why the study?
Current CVD risk stratification in type 2 diabetes remains suboptimal, leading to undertreatment and overtreatment.
Does CAC-guided multifactorial cardiovascular treatment reduce cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes without known cardiovascular disease?
RCT (n=7,300)
Open-label
Does CAC-guided multifactorial cardiovascular treatment reduce cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes without known cardiovascular disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The STENO INTEN-CT trial protocol outlines a pragmatic RCT to determine if a CAC-guided multifactorial treatment strategy improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes without known cardiovascular disease.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk remains high but unevenly distributed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Current risk stratification strategies are far from optimal, leading to both undertreatment and overtreatment of patients. The STENO INTEN-CT trial aims to evaluate a strategy of improved CVD risk management by using cardiac CT (coronary artery calcification (CAC)) for stratification and tailoring of multifactorial cardiovascular treatment based on CAC score. We hypothesise that (1) intensified medical treatment will lower CVD event rates in high-risk patients (CAC≥100), and (2) less intensive multifactorial treatment is safe in very low-risk patients (CAC=0). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Steno INTEN-CT trial is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, open-label, event-driven randomised controlled trial including patients with T2DM without known CVD. All participants (expected n=7300) will be invited for a non-contrast coronary CT scan. After the scan, participants will be randomised to either standard treatment (blinded for CAC results) or CAC-based treatment. Participants in CAC-based treatment and their general practitioner (GP) will receive information on CAC and a recommendation of multifactorial treatment. High-risk participants in the interventional arm will be invited for one or more initial study visits to intensify treatment with a combination of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, high-dose lipid-lowering, antihypertensive and antithrombotic treatment. Very low-risk patients in the interventional arm will be recommended less intensive treatment targets. After initial study-related activities, all participants will continue to be taken care of by their GP guided by specific treatment recommendations. The primary outcome in the primary hierarchical analysis (the rate of the combined CVD endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalisation for heart failure) will be monitored through national health registries. The trial is event-driven, but a median follow-up of 5 years is expected. Key secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcomes, quality-adjusted life years and healthcare costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol V.1.9 is approved by the Research Ethics Committee and the Danish Medicines Agency and the Danish Data Protection Agency. The results of the study-positive, negative or neutral-will be published in peer-reviewed journals and through www. CLINICALTRIALS: org. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05700877.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Funck et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus without known cardiovascular disease (n=7,300). CAC-based treatment vs. Standard treatment was evaluated on Combined CVD endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalisation for heart failure. The STENO INTEN-CT trial is an ongoing randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether CAC-guided multifactorial treatment reduces cardiovascular events in 7,300 patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: