Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In recent years, the necessity of brownfield redevelopment has garnered increasing attention in academic literature. This paper employs a systematic review methodology to analyse current perspectives on brownfield sustainability, with a focus on dimensions, indicators, and stakeholders. Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology, this study systematically reviews 40 articles from the WoS and Scopus databases. The findings highlight a shift towards prioritising ecological resilience and cultural preservation, alongside traditional economic, environmental, and social dimensions. The complexity of sustainability indicators is discussed, emphasising their crucial role in assessing redevelopment success. The review also identifies key stakeholders, including governments, developers, and community groups, who prioritise these dimensions due to their impact on sustainable urban development and community well-being. Future research should further explore cultural, ecological, and governance aspects, and refine sustainability indicators to more accurately capture the multidimensional performance of redevelopment projects. This analysis offers valuable insights for both academia and practice, advocating for policies that emphasise inclusive stakeholder engagement and comprehensive sustainability assessments to optimise brownfield reuse.
He et al. (Tue,) studied this question.