Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 27, 2022Frontiers in PsychiatryOpen Access

DEEMD-SPP framework outperforms other methods in EEG-based emotion recognition with ~75% valence classification accuracy.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Existing EEMD methods for EEG emotion recognition generate spurious modes from residual noise and yield varying numbers of decomposed intrinsic mode functions across signals.

Population

19 healthy participants, mean age 22.4 years, participating in a speech-evoked emotion cognitive experiment…

Design

Other

Key result

The proposed DEEMD-SPP framework achieved a classification accuracy of 74.5% for valence and 72.2% for arousal, outperforming other evaluated methods for EEG-based emotion recognition.

Authors

JCJing ChenHLHaifeng LiLMLin Ma

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May advance EEG emotion recognition tools; leaves open validation for cardiovascular or psychiatric use.

Structured PICO

P
Population
19 healthy participants (8 females, 11 males), mean age 22.4 years (range 18-27), participating in a speech-evoked emotion cognitive experiment yielding 1,373 trials.
I
Intervention
DEEMD-SPP framework (denoising ensemble empirical mode decomposition combined with Spatial Pyramid Pooling Network) for EEG signal feature extraction and emotion recognition
O
Outcome
Emotion recognition accuracy from EEG signals

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 74.5% vs 70.8%

The DEEMD-SPP framework improves emotion recognition from EEG signals by effectively eliminating residual noise and selecting valuable intrinsic mode functions.

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2022) studied Emotion recognition (n=19). DEEMD-SPP framework vs. EEMD-SVM was evaluated on Classification accuracy of valence. The proposed DEEMD-SPP framework achieved a classification accuracy of 74.5% for valence and 72.2% for arousal, outperforming other evaluated methods for EEG-based emotion recognition.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09e9dd00274e073d45c5cehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.885120
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share