Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The problem of the motion of a particle in an inverse-cube central force field is fully treated by quantum mechanics and the results compared with the classical theory. Taking the effective radial potential energy as Sr², although the solutions for negative energy for 0S-h²32π²μ satisfy the usual boundary conditions, they can not be admitted because the Hamiltonian is not Hermitian in these solutions. This corresponds to taking (l+1/2)² in place of $l(l+1)$ as the analogue of the square of the classical angular momentum. If we do this, we get a complete analogy between the classical and quantum mechanically allowed solutions, with no quantization. The solutions involve Bessel functions of both real and imaginary orders with both real and imaginary arguments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
George Shortley (1931) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: