Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Immigration has risen substantially in many E uropean economies, with far‐reaching if still uncertain implications for labour markets and industrial relations. This article investigates such implications, focusing on employment flexibility, involving both ‘external flexibility’ (fixed‐term or temporary agency and/or involuntary part‐time work) and ‘internal flexibility’ (overtime and/or balancing‐time accounts). The article identifies reasons why immigration should generally increase the incidence of such flexibility, and why external flexibility should rise more than internal flexibility. The article supports these claims using a dataset of establishments in 16 E uropean countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raess et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: