Why the study?
There are no standard techniques to track the effects of catheter ablation for persistent AF, and whether ablation diminishes atrial ECG dominant frequency was unknown.
Does catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation reduce A-ECG dominant frequency?
Does catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation reduce A-ECG dominant frequency?
Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation significantly reduces atrial dominant frequency as measured by surface A-ECG, though signal artifact limits analyzability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support A-ECG dominant frequency as a noninvasive marker of ablation effect in persistent AF; hypothesis-generating for outcome prediction.
Background: There are no standard techniques to track effects of catheter ablation (CA) of persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). The Atrial ECG (A-ECG) derived from the standard ECG provides the atrial dominant frequency (DF), an estimation of atrial rate. Research Question: Does CA for PeAF diminish A-ECG DF? Aims: To evaluate change in A-ECG peak DF pre- and post-CA. Methods: We obtained 1-minute epochs of surface ECG pre- and post-CA in 32 patients (age 63±9 years; 71% males) undergoing CA for PeAF. A-ECG was derived by QRST subtraction and independent component analysis filtering, and divided into overlapping10-second windows, each subjected to Fast Fourier Transform. DF was calculated for each lead as the average DF for all 10-sec segments. Peak A-ECG DF was assessed by regional lead group and among all leads. 10 patients were excluded for significant artifact. Of the 22 analyzed patients, all had pulmonary vein isolation and 3 had posterior wall isolation. Two-year outcomes were available in 20 patients (13 were free from recurrent AF). Results: The figure shows the change in the time-frequency plot (left panel) of DF for one subject and the shift in the spectra (right panel) with CA. A-ECG peak DF was significantly lower post- versus pre-CA: 5.96±0.63 vs 6.16±0.64 Hz, p=0.0009. By lead group, peak DFs were all lower post CA - Anterior (V1-3): 5.94±0.62 vs 6.13±0.64 Hz, p=0.0015; Inferior (II, III, aVF): 5.82±0.63 vs 6.01±0.66 Hz, p=0.0040; Lateral (I, aVL, V5-6): 5.82±0.64 vs 5.99±0.63 Hz, p=0.0015. In this small cohort, there was no significant difference in change of peak DF in those free from AF versus with recurrent AF (-2.4±4.3% vs -4.6±3.7%, p=0.26). Conclusion: The A-ECG provides physiologic information of activation rate in PeAF, but despite current, advanced signal processing techniques is analyzable in only 69% of patients. CA results in a significant reduction in DF. Clinical implications of these CA induced changes require further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaatari et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: